Wednesday, February 3, 2010

To Buddy or Not to Buddy


By Alex Brylske
Photo by Joseph C. Dovala

A funny thing happened to me this past weekend.

I was on a dive charter that included mostly tourists from up north who were escaping the ravages of winter. As is common, some were couples while others were alone. The couples of course had their buddy assignment covered.

The singles were a different matter. So, the divemaster proceeded to assign buddies to those on board who had none. As this is standard operating procedure, I went about my business thinking nothing of it. But my attention was soon drawn to a rather heated discussion between the captain and one of the lone divers.

The diver in question was vehemently refusing to dive with a stranger, insisting that he be allowed to dive solo. (He also apparently produced a card verifying a “solo diver” certification.) The captain would hear none of it and broke off the confrontation with the ultimatum that “you either dive with a buddy or you’re not diving from this boat.” Begrudgingly, the diver agreed.


After the dive, the angry would-be solo diver was more than eager to talk, so I spoke to him about the incident. It turned out that, indeed, he had taken a course in solo diving and said that he rarely ever dived with a buddy. His rationale was, in my view, quite solid and involved two premises. First, he resented having to dive with someone who he believed was less qualified than he was. He saw it as, in his words, “a baby-sitting assignment for which I had to pay.” He went on to cite several examples from past experience where he had to assist less qualified buddies with problems, thus ruining his own dive.


Second, and more importantly to him, what he enjoyed about diving most was the solitude, and that experience was spoiled by having an “intruder” (buddy) along for the ride. He also believed that, in most cases, people delude themselves into thinking that, just because you have a buddy, you’re safer than if you don’t. According to him, even if a buddy pair stays close enough to realize that the other has a problem (which he thought rarely happened), they probably wouldn’t be prepared to render any useful assistance, anyway. “Divers never practice emergency skills once they get out of training,” he insisted, “so good luck if you ever really need a buddy’s help in an emergency.”

I have to admit that the only two people who I personally enjoy diving with, and welcome as buddies, are my wife and my best friend. Anyone else is just an imposition and, frankly, I too would prefer to go it alone. I know for many of you reading this, that’s heresy, but I’m willing to wager that more folks subscribe to the sans buddy position than we realize.

So, I’m eager to hear what you readers think. Please post your comments below. Meanwhile, whether you dive with a buddy or you don’t, safety requires prudent, sensible decision making. And it requires that you regularly practice what to do in an emergency, too.

So, before opting out of the buddy system, particularly, make sure you know what you’re doing.

74 comments:

  1. Remember that show "Bosom Buddies?" Yeah, that was pretty cool.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Are there liability issues that the captain was concerned about with letting someone dive solo?Is that an issue with charter boats?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I beleive there are liability issues when a dive boat lets divers go solo, but are there any lawyers of charter boats out there who can give any details?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Diver should be free to go it alone. What good is a solo diver certification if it can't be used? Who issues those certifications, anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have been paired with some excellent divers and have had some bad experiences. I have learned to be direct and tell the new buddy what I expect and what he or she can expect from me. We do thourough pre-dive checks. The person knows I'm serious and that sets the stage for how we interact in the dive. If in this process on deck I feel this is not a good match, I don't hesitate to refuse. This has not happened often and in fact my new buddy procedure (descibed above)has likely turned some potentially bad experiences into good ones.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I had a horrible experience and will never let anyone buddy me up again. I'll take my own buddy or won't dive. I won't go solo.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree with the solo diver. Many times a buddy is a liability on a dive. Now besides my own gear and preparedness, I need to worry about his.
    I have been thinking of getting the solo certification.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If nothing else a solo certification teaches you to become more self-sufficient in all situations. Face it, even with most buddies you are diving solo. In an emergency you will probably have to save yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It's time we pull our heads out of the sand. With the proper training and experience there is no reason a diver can't dive SOLO and they do everyday. It's a shame the certification agencies(with the exception of one)don't realize this. The best buddy you can have is the solo diver.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Who coined the definition of the buddy system as 'same ocean same day'?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Buddies can be good or bad. My personal test? If you can communicate well on land, go under water with the buddy. If not, go solo...

    ReplyDelete
  12. 'Same ocean, same day.' HaHa. That's about right from what I've observed.

    ReplyDelete
  13. As much as i love her I don't love diving with my wife. She's an anchor. I catch myself engrossed in what I'm doing with no situational awareness, to find her off in her world too and God forbid something should happen to one of us. I think a solo diving course would be a huge benefit to both of us as we continue to dive this way together. Thanks for the idea.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I live in chicago, where the only thing we have to look at is brown fish and hope for good viz. When I go and pay good money to go on a trip to see amazing fish life, colorful reefs and 100+ viz, I don't need the job as babysitter as well. If my "buddy" decides to end the dive early, what happens to me? Will I get my money back for a short dive? My warm water trips are not often and I cherish every last PSI when I am down below. I should not have to pay for being a babysitter. Solo diving is OK if you are and can show proper training and all the gear required.

    ReplyDelete
  15. You stated that you personally only enjoy diving with two people, your wife and your best friend. Lucky for me I only have one person I really enjoy diving with, my wife, who is my best friend.
    Jerry A. in Phoenix

    ReplyDelete
  16. If you dive as part of a group, however assembled, then this notion of "after me and my wishes, you come first" is wholly inappropriate. Check your ego at the door.

    If people want to dive alone, more power to them. Best to rent a boat or walk in from shore. You have no such guaranteed prerogative if you're part of a group charter. It's not your boat. You signed on to be part of a group outing.

    As a solo, you have already determined that the sport's best practices just aren't appropriate for you. That's OK. Just don't think you're entitled to impose them on every, if any, dive master.

    In my experience, many divers wanting to solo in a group charter, and respectfully (or not) opting out of any responsibility to the group, are legends in their own mind. Their unsolicited chatter about their experiences on the ride to the dive site usually exposes them.

    My antennae go up -- and it is a factor in assesing what type of buddy they would be. Once in the water, they often dive at skill and awareness levels far below their bravado on the boat.

    The best recreational divers I've seen assess the knowledge, attitude, readiness and skill level of an assigned buddy before entering the water. If their calculus indicates an unsafe or unskilled suggested buddy pairing, they will bring it to the attention of the dive master -- that's his/her job to address. And opt out of the pairing if appropriate in lieu of another candidate.

    More often than not, I've seen the better diver help the assigned buddy just by good example. And everyone gets more out of the day's dives. It's also called being unselfish, which applies even if you're on vacation. It's certainly not "babysitting."

    As a recreational rescue-certified diver, I know about the importance of assessing risks, remedies and limits of my ability to assist a buddy whether it be a trivial or serious matter. When to act and when not to. And I know that most people thrown together on that dive boat won't have my level of training if I get in a jam. You are always self-reliant.

    The simple question is are you more likely to be worse off without a buddy, all things considered?

    I

    ReplyDelete
  17. I moved to S. Florida last May from Okla and havebeen diving for 20+ years. I had to use commercial dive boats and they always put me with a buddy, some very good-some very bad, one lady went through 3000lb of air at 30 ft in just 25 min. Those bad dives have made me start beach diving alone so that I dont have to babysit others either. The commercial boats should have a waiver to allow certified solo divers to still dive from thier boats and get the dive time they paid for, not just the time used by the worst diver.

    ReplyDelete
  18. my experiences with charter and personal diving, with charters the insurance thing gets in the way of solo diving, but i would at times rather solo dive out like that for the fact most tourists are out there just to brag when they get home and never go diving again, those that have a true interest in the sport and enviroment i enjoy going out with and giving them a great experience, but they are far and few between, they make it enjoyable and are safety concious, the others dont even think about safety and really dont care to soak in the adventure or even care about you or those around, one experience me and my wife had was a tourist was more interested in getting closer to the women in the group and tryin to look cool, so at times i would say go alone, other times a buddy that is new to the sport or that is a stranger can be an enjoyable and good experience. keep divin safely....

    ReplyDelete
  19. Jim Butler MSDT 231805February 22, 2010 at 3:36 PM

    In Oct.,2007, PADI issued it's position regarding solo diving.If you read the article, it should be despositive of your concerns, and should be, in my opinion, reviewed by all instructors. Additionally, the question as to whether the boat captain would let someone dive alone, even if certified, is his choice-the captain's order is the "law' of the sea. It seems your article is more provocative than informative.

    ReplyDelete
  20. If one wants to solo dive, one should take an independent, redundant alternate air source on the dive. The amount of air contained in this source will depend on the depth and conditions of the dive. Anyone not heeding this advice may find himself or herself in a world of trouble when one least expects it. A buddy may not be much use at all, but it's better than no alternate air in case of air depletion.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I am the only one in my family right now that dives so on trips to SC I end up getting paired up with someone. Most of time it works out but at times it doesnt. I've had some real winners. I will us Nitrox then dont get any advantage because my budy is not. I lose bottom time. Once I used up 1000 psi just trying to get my rookie dive buddy to the bottom. I do like to dive solo and have trained for it. One boat lets me as I get to spear fish or hunt artificats without the crowd.
    So good luck I understand where you come from. So now I am training my wife and daughters to dive.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Yes, if you dive a charter / group boat you are expected to buddy up. Don't expect to load nitrox and not get only 45 minutes or so. You are with a group.

    With this said, you should feel empowered to discuss the level of competency of your pair and bring any concerns to the dive master. Once you commit to the dive, chill and enjoy it.

    I have also had my share of good and not so good buddies and I am sure that some may say the same of me.

    Bottom line so to speak, if you want to dive solo, please do so. When you dive with a group, properly set your own expectations - you will start and end with the group, you will have a buddy, the dive is structured for non-nitrox, etc. Thus is the nature of this type of dive. My general rule is when with a diver of less experience I follow them and enjoy the perhaps slower pace and I have seen some wondrous little creatures that I might otherwise have missed. When with someone of equal or greater experience discuss our expectations together and usually will have a good dive ...

    ReplyDelete
  23. Creating a legal obligation of due care is a possible but usually overlooked aspect of a buddy system pairing. Does each diver agree to watch after his/her newly acquired buddy and come to his/her rescue if necessary? A basic tenet of law is absent a duty there is no legal liability. But if each buddy agrees to take care of the other, arguably each then has created a legal duty to use due care , with legal liability flowing from being a negligent buddy if this negligence is the cause of harm to the other. You then have potential liability while the dive operator has limited his via a dive release that does not release you for negligence on your part in carrying out any duties attendant on being a dive buddy. Yet another reason to think twice before agreeing to a forced buddy pairing if there is any way to avoid this seagoing shotgun marriage.

    ReplyDelete
  24. call the dive charter before you book a trip and see if they allow solo diving with proof of cert. maybe someday there will be a website devoted to listing those dive operations who will allow solo diving. im sure we are all tired of babysitting and having to pay to do that on top of everything else is just wrong!!

    LTB MSDT fla.

    ReplyDelete
  25. This isn't that big a deal. If you want to dive solo get a boat or giant stride off a pier. The charters have their rules for a reason and I'm sure it has a lot to do with the suit sharks and our legal system.

    ReplyDelete
  26. As an avid UW photographer, I prefer to dive alone and more than half of my dives have taken place with no buddy system in place. When I do voluntarily dive with a buddy, he/she is also an UW photographer and is, for the most part, totally oblivious to my presence and needs should one arise; I might as well be diving solo.

    Having been an instructor for 8 years, and having much advanced technical training and tech diving experience, and with more than 2000 dives under my belt, any diver that I am assigned to will almost certainly be much less experienced. When assigned to an unfamiliar and inexperienced buddy, rather than become beligerent as did the person in the article, I drop into "instructor mode" and challenge myself to make this dive a positive experience for my new-found "buddy". Pointing out creatures and helping them with time management and navigational skills becomes a challenge and the "thrill" of the dive.

    When forced to dive with a less experienced "buddy", I certainly do not dive with the idea that this buddy will bail me out of a tight situation. I dive as I would when diving solo, constantly monitoring my physical and mental condition, and always preparing for an emergency.

    But the absolute worst situation occurs when there is an odd number of divers and I am assigned to what becomes a 3-some buddy system. As an instructor, I called it the "third man out" buddy system. Usually the other two people know each other and I am the stranger. That is absolutely worthless as a buddy system and probably only serves to cover the captains butt for liability reasons. I can deal with it, but pity the new diver who is depending on his/her new-found "buddies" for anything at all.

    ReplyDelete
  27. As a solo diving instructor I wonder if the diver that wanted to dive solo was equipped to dive solo.

    There are liability issues for the boat and captain and the diver should have had a solo diving release that he could have offered the crew.

    Did he have a redundant air supply and any other equipment that would be required for a self rescue at that location.

    Showing up with a solo diver card is not the same as showing up equipped to dive solo. If not properly equipped the crew shouldn't let you dive solo. A properly equipped diver should be able to deal with most common dive and self rescue situations.

    When I have gone solo I used double 100's, dual bladder high lift wing, dual air integrated computers,back up air gauge, compass, multiple cutting tools, wreck reel,spare mask, and lift bag as a starting point. Then I add lights, surface signaling devices and other equipment as needed.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I dive a lot for lobsters in Boston, frequently my buddies and I drop in together, do a quick check on the surface, then meet at the anchor and do another quick check then we scatter on our own to pursue bugs as we like. Most accidents happen on the surface so we are careful there, but hunting for lobsters with a buddy is too slow and inefficient.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Buddy diving makes scuba diving safer when buddies as committed to looking after each other during a dive, but I often see buddies entering the water together and part away once at depth, essentially making their dive a solo dive. We need to recognize that we practice solo diving more often that we realize and I think that dive agencies need to understand this and expand their course offerings to allow divers who are willing to go solo to get the proper training.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I understand the buddy concept and if you have two equally trained buddies that know each other then it's a good system. But if you don't know the other person then it's just a liability. I for one take stock in the fact that you need to know what you're doing and take care of yourself. I keep my equipment maintained, I know my limits and carry spare air as a back-up just in case. I know I'm prepared with or without a buddy. I have dived solo a few times and felt confident in my own abilities to do so.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I avoid having a buddy whenever possible. If I
    have to pair up with someone I dive with the idea that if they need help I will be able to
    assist them. However, if I need help I assume
    they will be unable to provide it and I must be
    able to handle it myself. The only time I make
    sure I dive with a buddy is when I am diving
    deeper than 150 feet. And then, there is only
    one person in my circle of divers that I feel
    has the knowledge and ability to assist at that
    depth.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I think that a case can be made for both schools of thought. First I have been paired up on a boat with an unknown diver, but I make it a point to go talk to the person they want to buddy me with. if I find that their skills are not up to what I feel is necessary I tell the divemaster or captain that, I want another buddy. And if they cant provide one that is acceptable I request the to dive alone or with the divemaster. If the person that they want to buddy me with is a skilled diver then maybe I have another friend, and if this is going to be a week long trip we have solved a problem.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I have been a diver for 55 years and an instructor for 50. Most of my diving (except for students) has been solo due to the circumstances of the dive. I have no problem with solo diving and most divers are trained to be self-sufficient. Whether they ARE or not will only be known if they find themselves in a situation which requires the assistance of a buddy. Even if that buddy is present, he may not be of any assistance unless he recognizes the problem and then responds appropriately. The odds of all that happening properly in a span of a few seconds (out of air) is highly unlikely. As a safety feature, the buddy system is primarily a "feel good" policy. More importantly, the buddy system offers the opportunity for two or more divers to share a special moment that may have been limited to only one if they were solo diving. Enjoy the dive and share it with a friend but don't depend on him for your safety.

    ReplyDelete
  34. I dive with friends (those I know well and those I don’t know at all) and I dive solo. I have over 35yrs of dive experience and teaching as a Course Director and I enjoy diving with friends who are experienced and those who are not. I also enjoy diving solo, because the experience of being underwater in solitude provides a freedom that is sometimes beyond words. I personally, believe that if a diver has the experience and or training to dive solo, let them!!! I can understand the boat captains concern, but he’s lost that divers business and may suffer even more loss of business as a result of the solo divers word of mouth. There are ways to limit the risk as a boat captain for solo divers. As an example, have the solo diver agree to a specific dive plan that a surface Divemaster can reference, just in case. There are others, but if the diver is prepared and has experience, let them dive solo.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Mike Smith Augusta, GAMarch 2, 2010 at 2:58 PM

    I have many years of dive experience and for the most part I have always dove with a buddy. Now as the years are gaining on me I find myself completely comfortable in solo diving. For the past three years I have dove solo more times than I can count. I currently am a member of the local dive rescue team and I can say we usually start out as a team but end up on solo searches for lost items, bodies, and assisting the local authorities on evidence recovery. I personal believe that it is up to the lone diver to decide his own fate. Now i want to live a long time and I dive with that frame of mind, I have practiced many different situations involving a dive emergency. I find myself to be a confident diver and am not the least bit worried on my solo dives.

    ReplyDelete
  36. I really put myself at risk once diving with an "unknown" after I had to chase her down to stop her from descending into the abyss. We blew so far thru the floor of the dive i was confused about legnth of the deco stop or if it would even help.

    I expected to bend over for hours ater the dive, luckily i was lucky. NEVER AGAIN!

    ReplyDelete
  37. I am a certified solo diver with years of experience and have assisted in real emergencies (always involving divers with buddies). I am a photographer so I prefer to dive alone but I don't disagree when told to buddy-up!! Recognizing my inattention while carrying a camera, I offer the camera to my "new" buddy so that I provide me undivided attention to my buddy during the dive. The article above by Ed Herbst pretty much summed up solo diving. I would only add that to become a better diver: "everyone should be a certified solo diver, but not everyone should dive solo" only those properly trained, equipped and comfortable with the dive. All dive agencies should offer Solo Diving Cert.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Richard (the) DivehardMarch 3, 2010 at 9:44 AM

    One of the more intelligent statements in all of these blogs is the one above -- "everyone should be a certified solo diver, but not everyone should dive solo." And does anyone know why more agancies don't offer Solo Certs?

    ReplyDelete
  39. Being comfortable while having fun is very important to my diving experience. If my buddy adds to the experience thats a bonus.
    I think some diving situations require a buddy and others don't, it just depends on the situation. I would never want to be thought of as holding someone back. I'm a good diver but more on the conservative side, a stranger doesn't know my abilities. I would not want to dive with a buddy that didn't want me there, there would be no trust and no real backup if needed. I guess if I wasn't going diving with friends, I probably wouldn't be out there anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Every diver should be prepared to handle himself or herself in an emergency, and should adopt a "solo" mentality with regard to accountability -- "I am first and foremost responsible for my safety."

    I've done lots of solo diving, safely.

    However, I prefer to share the scuba experience with another person -- one that I know and love or one that I just met on the way to the dive site. I find it enriching and rewarding, even if we move a little slower than I might if going it alone. Or if I have to surface a little earlier because my partner is an air hog.

    Maybe we should examine some underlying negative attitudes here....

    "Me first, f-you."
    "I don't trust anyone, stay away from me."
    "I want my money's worth."
    "I want everything my way and I don't play well with others."
    "I'm better than you. You suck."

    Diving is supposed to be fun. Just wondering where all the mistrust and elitist attitudes came from...

    ReplyDelete
  41. First of all, Alex, congratulations on this editorial. I enjoyed it very much.

    I was very pleasantly surprised, because, well, your magazine is excellent and in every issue I learn something new and I enjoy the refreshers of basic diving technique ("a good diver is always learning").

    However, perhaps because of the market segment for your publication (new divers and instructors), I don't consider it edgy. I remember an issue where there was a complaint letter because in the previous issue either there was a photo of a diver without a snorkel or an article that suggested putting just enough air in the drysuit for avoiding squeeze and using the BCD for buoyancy -- and instead of using that as an opening for exploring other points of view, there was a note saying that divers should follow the recommendations of their training agencies, which sounded almost apologetic for showing or discussing something which was out of line with what is taught in the classrooms.

    So, it was very refreshing (and surprising, in a nice way!) to see this discussion pop-up here.

    I have my usual dive buddy, our SAC rates, interests, speeds, and objectives are about the same, I know his gear and he knows mine. We are almost always close (unless we are doing search patterns looking for something), and always aware of where the other one is, and we sometimes practice emergency procedures while at the safety stop. So yes, in any given situation, he would be my first choice for a buddy.

    But we are both comfortable diving solo and it's something we both also do when we can't dive together. We were diving solo before we met each other, and the interesting thing is that we realized that we had both read almost the same books about it, and we are aware of the issues and limitations of diving solo. That is, we didn't just go blindly into it.

    I also often go out with photographers, and unless you are helping them, you are diving solo too.

    I have been paired with buddies where I don't enjoy the dive because all the time I'm just trying to keep an eye on them, they have no idea of where I am, they don't follow the dive plan, they take off without waiting to see if I'm aware that they are going somewhere, etc. In those cases, I would really prefer to dive solo, but sometimes, unfortunately, that is not allowed (when it's a dive club trip or in some charter boats).

    So, in conclusion, I see the theoretical benefits of the buddy system, but I feel that for most people the main benefit is a psychological one, to see someone nearby, since you can't really be sure that in case of need the buddy will help. It is taught in classes, but I don't think that it's something that the average diver practices frequently enough.

    However, when you have a dive buddy that you know and trust, the benefit is definitely there.

    It would be great if there were a way to be certain that each and every diver out there is competent at any given moment to assist in case of need. It is taught in classes and it's part of the check-out dives, but I would venture to say that for some divers that was the last time they worried about it.

    Again, congratulations on touching this topic.

    ReplyDelete
  42. John Depp (not that one)March 6, 2010 at 8:22 AM

    A couple responses back the person who almost got bent chasing down a buddy, I had that happen too. But I've had some incredible dives with new people who were so excited about it that it made my dive more enjoyable and actually refreshed my attitude and the reason why I love to dive. The value of the buddy system goes beyond safety. It's also a spiritual thing.

    ReplyDelete
  43. I have always liked to think of my being able to SCUBA dive as a priviledge and not an entitlement. I received my training with an emphasis on safety and sharing my love of diving with others. I have no understanding for those that will jepordize the spirit of this with their entitlement attitudes.
    In the broader picture, the "solo diver" movement is just another example of our certification agencies push to please everyone despite the potential problems. At the end of the subject article it is stated "safety requires prudent, sensible decision making"---I wonder how well a 10 to 14 year old can handle this??
    Maybe it would sound better if we juiced the term up and called it "swim buddies". And we all know that the creature will get you if you lose THAT buddy.

    ReplyDelete
  44. I have YMCA OW, PADI AOW, NAUI AOW, NAUI NITROX, NACD CAVERN AND SDI-TDI SOLO certifications and about 350 dives.

    The SOLO cert course was by far the most valuable one I've taken. Basically, if you are diving with someone you know and you both have similar experience levels, then that would be the "optimal" situation to buddy dive.

    However if you've been trained in SOLO Diving I believe you may be compromising both yourself and your "buddy" if paired with a stranger.

    You don't know this other person, have no idea how they react or what their "competence" level is. Moreover how many times will they drift away trying to take photos or whatever and haven't a clue where you are or what they would do if there was a problem.

    And let's not forget the not so secret but rarely discussed issue of divers who've sat at the bar the night before, got hammered and then arrive for a dive that they physiologically and psychologically are impaired to do from the outset.

    Since I usually travel alone, I have gotten into the habit of telling the divemaster that I will be diving "with him or her" and there is never any issue made about it.

    I think "buddy diving" is possibly the most misguided of requirements for recreational divers, with the exception of what I stated previously, that both divers have similar experience levels and know each other or who have taken a SOLO course. The SOLO course requires you having some redundant air supply and teaches other skills for solo safety.

    Thanks,


    Sy

    ReplyDelete
  45. I am a new diver with only 3 years under my belt. My dive training has taught me never to dive alone. While I would like to try it some day in a safe environment, I would never try it with the limited experence that I have.
    I trust and respect my Divemasters and instructers.I know that even with their years of experience they would not dive alone. They teach by example. I do try to be the good dive buddy and respect my partners needs. All I want is to get wet and have a good dive.
    Dive safe and Happy off gassing.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Diving alone is a good way to go when there is no one else around. If you must dive with a stranger try having a conversation with that diver to see what there style is and if not very compatible ask the dive master to pare you up with someone else. If you are diving with someone with less experience than your self this would be a good time to share your past knowledge, this will in the long run improve the sport and enrich your inner self.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Diving is great to share with anyone, whether you know them or not. The issue is safety and compatability. Go in knowing the experience level of the other person, and they have to know yours. Understand how they want to dive. Then say yes or no, it's your right, or should be.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Throughout my diving career spanning from the late 70's, I have mostly dived solo. I always have someone in the boat following as I drift. This is a personal decision that I made after several harrowing experiences while 'buddy diving'. I maintain my equipment meticulously, and carry a redundant air supply. This arrangement has worked for me, and I will continue to do so.

    ReplyDelete
  49. I am in my 60's, grew up in the Florida Keys and have been scuba diving since I was 7 before there was certification...I'm certified in ice, cavern, rescue, nitrox, mixed gas, wreck and a few others I can't even remember [old age !!]..I've dived all over the world; S. America, Africa, Iceland, Greenland, Europe, Canada and the U.S [both coasts and inland waters. I've dove with and w/o buddies. My favorite diving over the years is the solitude of shallow water marine fossil hunting on Florida's Gulf coast. But it really is a matter of ability, experience, 'comfort zone' and circumstances....Intelligent diving is the key...

    ReplyDelete
  50. Interesting issue. My wife and I are buddies. We understand each other, communicate and navigate well under water. We have been asked multiple times to accept another person to dive with us as a threesome. We always decline, unless the person is someone with skills we know and respect. First, we do not want the responsibility (what about OUR liability?). Second, we do not want to be beholden to underwater decisions taken by someone we do not know, be they seemingly reasonable or not. Third, we do not want to babysit someone (and that is hardly the worst that could happen, of course). Buddies can be absolutely great! My wife is such a one for me. However, I personally think that the emphasis on buddies is misplaced. I much prefer the axiom, "Every dive is a solo dive." If divers were trained with that mind-set, they would be better off to start with and a good buddy would be icing on the cake.

    ReplyDelete
  51. All things being equal, would I rather assume responsibility for a person I have never met before the boat left the dock, whose dive skills are completely unknown to me, or would I choose to go solo?

    I've been diving for 30 years and I am more willing to risk my safety diving solo than to dive with a buddy who may well be a complete rookie or possibly an experienced diver who has no bouyancy control and no sense of the sea.

    The only buddies I enjoy diving with are my family and my personal friends whose skills are known to me.

    ReplyDelete
  52. I have been diving for over 40 years, 35 as a DM, and buddies were preferable in the challenging shore diving environments of my early days but now resort charter boats are the most common method of getting wet. Given the opportunity I would dive solo any time unless it was with a friend or family. As a single diver with a DSLR camera, I have an aversion to the inevitable question” does everyone have a buddy”. I have always dived with the philosophy of self sufficiency with redundant air sources and emergency equipment which is all well maintained. Since I am not going to waste time arguing with the boat captain for the solo diver option, after the obligatory match up, I try and size up my new buddy on the boat and make it clear that I will be keeping a loose cover and encourage my new buddy to keep the guide in sight. I have declined a couple of times due to suggestions of “I’m a heavy breather” or “it’s been a few years since my last dive”. I am not spending my precious air time baby sitting. With an experienced diver this is an acceptable buddy pair since we both have the same expectations of each other. In most cases it is a challenge just to get the other divers name and dive style, let alone discuss equipment characteristics and emergency procedures. Since I am hunting for photo opportunities and clear water, I am out front near the guide or take the lead in a pair. If my “buddy” is also taking pictures, it’s a simple case of “same ocean, same day”.

    The final result is when it comes to instant match up’s on a charter boat, I am a dive buddy until I hit the water, then I am a solo diver and so is the other diver!!!

    ReplyDelete
  53. Most of these comments are well considered and the different views are interesting. My bottom line is that people should be free to make their own choices and do their own things. So I'll go off track to the bigger issue. Repeal the health care monstrocity and get the overreaching tenticles of the government out of our lives. Do something about the frivilous lawsuits that drive so much of what we do, all the way down to this issue in our little industry.

    ReplyDelete
  54. I've been a scuba diving instructor for 17 years and have always considered every dive as a solo dive. The way I see it, is that even though I may be with 8 other so-called "divers" I can not expect any of them to have the skills to conduct a rescue for me, or even recognize that ther is even a rescue needed.

    Indy
    I beleive that an independant diver is a safer diver. I do not let any of my students become dependant entirely on their dive buddy. A good dive buddy is one that will have good self rescue skills, one that can be looked on as a "solo diver."
    We all are responsible for choosing a good dive buddy to match our individual styles and types of dives that we are doing. I know that not all dive buddys, especially the ones thrust upon us on dive boats, are the best match. We all have to consider that we ahve to take the good with the bad. I, of couse, try to keep the bad buddy situation to a minimum with good communication with the new buddy and hope that I can make that diver a better "dive "buudy" for all of our safety.
    With all that being said, I still to dive solo from time to time. I too need a break from baby setting a new dive buddy.

    ReplyDelete
  55. I have been diving since the early 70's. My certification level is instructor. I find it safer to dive alone than with most recently certified divers or divers that only make a couple of dives every other year. However, when on a boat that requires a buddy system I try to use the dive to enhance my skills. I find myself slipping into the instructor mode, and generally being a dive guide. Often the forced buddy thanks me for making their dive more interesting (few novice divers take the time to notice what is around them unless they are shown). If you really want to dive solo and use a charter boat you can develop a relationship with the divemaster/boat captain. Once they know you and your abilities they often will allow you to dive alone and take you to some really cool sites.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Gary F. "Frogman" AndersonMarch 31, 2010 at 6:34 PM

    I've been diving 49 years, Navy trained. I've done military, commercial, police, tech, and recreational diving. I've been a PADI Divemaster for 30 years, and used to frequently volunteer as a Divemaster and Assistant Instructor. These days, I only do underwater photography and soul/therapy diving.

    Over the years, I've had some really outstanding dive buddies, and I strongly prefer buddy diving. But, I also fequently dive "Mike Nelson Style" (Solo) as in SEA HUNT 1958-61. The problem is that good dive buddies are damn hard to find.

    Frankly, the recreational dive industry does a p--- poor job of teaching dive students exactly how to buddy dive. Just telling them to "stick together" ain't ever gonna cut it.

    If on a charter boat, I've no problem with a Divemaster, or Instructor following me around, as long as they co-operate with my photo shooting. Having an average rookie diver assigned as my dive buddy while I'm shooting is absolutely unsat.

    If I'm just doing a soul/therapy dive, I'm OK with an assigned buddy, as long as they dive by my "Dive Buddy Rules".

    1. They will swim at my side (not in front, and not behind) at all times.
    2. They will maintain a seperation of 3ft. to 8ft. (Or they will be snapped into my 2 meter buddy line.)
    3. They will maintain situational awareness at all times, and will make frequent eye contact with me. I will frequently stop without warning. If they go oblivious on me, and swim on unawares, I ain't gonna chase them, and I will no longer accept any responsibility for their survival.
    4. If they see something they want to look at, they will tap me on the shoulder, point, and we will check it out together.
    5. They will frequently throw me an "Okay? Okay" signal.
    6. They will use good buoyancy control, and not muck up my photos, or harrass or disturb the sea life.

    They will do this, or they will find another dive buddy right now, before we dive.

    If they do this, we will both have a great, interesting, and fun dive.

    If they pass muster, and we have a successful dive, they will be admitted into my prestigious and exclusive association of distinguished undersea explorers.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Frogman expander...April 2, 2010 at 3:58 AM

    Gary "Frogman" brings up a great point. Dive training doesn't teach people 'how' to buddy dive. It just pretty much 'tells' them to do it. He's right, buddy diving is a skill. Agencies should include this as a module in their training. Heck, who needs the agencies. Stores and instructors should include it as a service to their customers. Perhaps then buddy pairing would be less of an issue.

    ReplyDelete
  58. As a Scuba Instructor with over 3000 dives I too find it an incumbrance to have a dive buddy of unknown skill and talent.

    While diving with a class, especially a beginners group, an Instructor is not only responsible for his own safety but has a duty to perform as a lookout and safety provider for the entire group. Under these conditions, the likelihood of any of my candidates being able to assist me in a true emergency is extremely slim. I am actually safer diving solo than with this group.

    Though I can understand the Captain's fear of litigious actions taken by a solo diver, I prefer to dive solo when my "Comfort" buddy is not available. What do I mean by "Comfort Buddy"? It is someone who dives at or near my level and is familiar with my style of diving and equipment. Someone who I have trained with to know specific emergency procedures and how we would handle them as a team. Buddied with a stranger of unknown quality or training actually makes me more concerned.

    When forced by the Captain or Boat Master to pair with an "Unknown" I follow this set of actions.

    1 - I inform the Captain privately what my level of expertise is and my preference to dive solo.

    2 - If this does not persuade him, and he is normally not moved by my request, I ask him to pair me with a diver of equal or higher ability.

    3 - If he has a boat full of inexperienced divers I suggest that he permit me to tag along with the group at the far end so long as I stay in his sight.

    4 - When push comes to shove, I'd rather buddy dive than not dive. With my assigned buddy of unknown "quality," I'll sit and discuss training and experience levels that we both have obtained. I will bring up all of the typical emergencies that might occur. ( I.E., Out of Air, Missing Buddy, Entanglement, Sinus or other Pain, etc.) We will work out and agree on a plan on how to handle these emergencies. When gearing up, I will explain how my specific kit may or may not be standard. How I would dump weights (weight integrated or weight belt -- as a photographer I will at times use ankle weights or a weight mounted on the lower section of my tank - How the dump valves are activated on my BC, etc.) I will have him do the same for his gear. We will discuss our dive plan and agree on that as well as an alternate plan should something arise. And, before entering the water, I check my buddies gear, including air and have him check mine.

    Basically, I'm forming a full buddy alliance, someone who I hope I can depend on.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Regarding your editorial on diving with a buddy, or without:

    Several thoughts. First, as I understand it, solo dive courses teach redundancy in everything; air tanks, buoyancy (dry suit AND a buoyancy compensator), extra mask, and so on. If someone is diving on a dive trip without TOTAL redundancy, they aren't diving according to their training, they just don't want the responsibility of a "less experienced" buddy. Second, it is the responsibility of every diver to assist those "less experienced" divers. This is an awesome sport, and each of us needs to pass along our knowledge. Third, if you want to insist on diving solo, you'd better clear it with the Captain before paying your money. The safety of each diver is the Captain's ultimate responsibility, and if the Captain says "Thou shalt dive with a buddy," well, that's it. Finally, like it or not, each and every one of us are safer with a buddy than without. There is very little a "less experienced" buddy can do to make an emergency situation worse, and often it only takes very little effort to prevent a poor situation from becoming a full blown emergency.

    I have not been diving a very long time, only about three years, but have several certifications, and love the sport like none other. Let's just keep diving (with a buddy) and enjoying our underwater world.

    ReplyDelete
  60. I am a Canadian PADI Insturctor trained in Cavern/Cave and wreck diving. I solo dive because of the freedom and no hassle of having to babysit a buddy. If I am teaching, I am solo diving. Like some newbee with 10 minutes under their belt is going to save my life. I have had buddies desert me on a dive, kick my reg and mask off and stay so far away from me on a dive I thought I was the only one in the ocean. When I come across other instructors they think I have stepped over the line in solo diving. I do make sure I do not show myself as a solo diver amongst any diving classes as this is against PADI standards and I do not wish to influence other divers to do what they might not be comfortable with or have not been trained for. Yes, a closet solo diver, but a solo diver that believes in total redundancy and follows all the safety precaustions! Signed, a solo diver in Victoria BC.

    ReplyDelete
  61. I support the buddy system for several reasons. In my opinion, I am still a novice diver with just a few dives short of 50. My dive buddy has been through most of my bad dives with me. As a Divemaster and a teacher, she has demostrated and reinforced the classroom education relative to the issue experienced. Therefore, I am more confident in my abilities and I implicitly trust her judgement. Secondly, as a qualified submarine sailor, I learned that everyone's life onboard that submarine was dependent on me to react correctly to any situation anywhere. Because of that lesson, I have gratefully thanked other crew members for their reactions in a casualty situation that saved my life and the lives of my shipmates. The submarine team training mantra I have carried over into diving. Certified or not, I will never solo dive. My dive buddy holds my life in her hands as well as I hold her life in mine. The peace of mind this gives me helps to make diving a pure pleasure.

    ReplyDelete
  62. I've been diving for38 years both as a commercial diver and as a padi instructor. I teach the buddy system and believe it's a good thing. I also am a photographer and like to have my solititude as a solo diver. As I always have my head in nooks and crannies I would have totally missed the 14 foot hammerhead shark swimming buy just a few feet away if my dive buddy had not gotten my attention. It was like a big bus going by. We high fived each other inan amazed state and kept diving. She was a great dive buddy and we just had just met on the boat. Im mostly always a lone diver but 99% of the time I have a great dive even though some of the divers are "newbies".

    ReplyDelete
  63. I have only been diving for about 3 ½ years now, have 65 dives logged and have trained with PADI organizations through Rescue Diver. One of the first things they teach you in the Rescue course is to put the ‘S’ (self) back into SCUBA. You also learn how dangerous a panicked diver can be. I firmly believe that you should be ready to handle your problems as they may occur and not have a false sense of security just because you’re diving with someone. In my opinion a diver should possess a strong presence of mind and be capable of having rational intelligent though processes when it comes to dealing with problems.

    Recently I was on vacation in Jamaica and ended up on several dives where I was diving with strangers I had just met on the boat and didn’t mind. The following weekend I was back in my home state diving in cold (48deg) water in a dry suit with 10’ of visibility and again had a dive buddy I had just met. In this case I was less worried about my buddy’s skills because they were similar to mine in that we were both diving dry suits and had both made numerous dives in the cold waters of the New England. There was one diver on the boat who did dive solo and I was asked if I wanted to as well. I choose to buddy up because I felt confident with the guy who I was going to dive with. When you’re in warm water in the Caribbean you don’t know what you’re dealing with and a lot of times what you are dealing with is someone who only resort dives once or twice a year in warm water. I don’t particularly like to feel like I’m babysitting in those circumstances and don’t want that other diver to think that I’m watching his/her back all the time, so what I do is generally lag just behind my buddy so that I can easily keep an eye on my buddy without having to turn around.

    All that being said, I really don’t have a problem diving solo either. Typically when I lobster dive, I may enter the water with a buddy but we quickly get separated looking for lobster. I’ve done this on several occasions and have thoroughly enjoyed the dives; some of which have been as deep as 75’. I have also solo dived on Florida reefs after my dive buddy aborted the dive shortly after entry, for one reason or another.

    It’s really a matter of personal preference and ultimately being able to assume responsibility for yourself and your actions. If you feel comfortable diving solo than do so, just be sure you’ve dealt with any apprehensions that you may have; again, solid presence of mind is critical.

    I also wanted to comment on one of the other posts regarding liability of the boat captain. On several dive boat charters that I’ve been on, the only responsibility they have it to get you to and from the dive site. They are basically a water taxi and once you get into the water you are on your own and responsible for what happens there. If you’re really adamant about diving solo but the captain says no, then it becomes a personal choice of whether or not you dive. As others in this column have mentioned, you can learn some interesting things from people you meet and buddy up with… Happy Diving!

    ReplyDelete
  64. After more than 40 years of diving, and literally thousands of dives, primarily on shipwrecks in the Great Lakes where visibility was marginal at best below 100', one soon learned that the dive plan was based on self reliance. Budding up was the last consideration due to cramped penetration conditions, limited silt visibility and the desire to not have ones exit potentially blocked. Not by classes, or by instructor direction were the pitfalls of solo diving learned. Common sense, review of past dives that had potentially hazaradous results, and rethinking the dive profile, along with added safety equipment were what changed and improved the solo diving experience. The ultimate responsibility for diver safety is placed on the diver by himself.

    Dive plan, equipment check, depth expected, current, wind and water conditions, down / return line location(s), are just a few of the considerations. Uncomfortable with any aspect of the dive? DO NOT DIVE. Bruce Longman PADI Emeritus Inst. #999

    ReplyDelete
  65. The scenario: You are diving along and your buddy sees something interesting and gets 3 kick cycles ahead of you, aren't you basically diving solo now? If you have an out of air emergency this far away from your buddy you will not catch him, you will either die where you are or if you remember your OW training you will do an emergency swimming acent and then deal with the bends when you get to the surface. Oh and thats if you didn't hold your breath and get an expansion injury and one of your lungs is hanging outa your mouth. Solo diving does not necessarily mean that you are the only one in the water, it means that you are self sufficient. I am solo certified and I have never been diving all alone and probably never will. But I also know that if I have an emergency that I am better trained and have a redundant air source, something most do not have.

    Something else that most people do not know, and that is because they are not certified solo divers, is that while diving solo (by yourself)your MOD (max opperating depth) is twice that which you can free dive to. Therefore if I can free dive to 25' then my solo MOD is 50'. At 50' with my Spare Air I am pretty confident that I will see the next day and probably not get bent.

    Being solo certified is nothing more than diving the way you dive now, but with the knowledge and redundancy to recover on your own if something does fail.

    Someone also commented that "it is our duty to educate the non educated buddy" or something like that. Negative! My only duty as a recreational diver is to dive within my limits, follow the dive plan, be safe and have a great time enjoying God's underwater creation (yes, I beleive in God). We are all responsible for ourselves and with proper training we will continue to be (no short courses, this breeds the buddy you don't want on vacation). It is only when you take the next step in your diving career and go up to the profesional level (dive master, dive controller, instructor, etc...) that you become responsible for the "less educated" divers. I do not go on dive vacations to baby sit idiots who are not smart enough to get proper training or enough training.

    I vote "DIVE SOLO"!

    Signed,
    SSI Dive Con
    SDI Solo Cert.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Totally agree with the latest (SSI Dive Con)post. You may be surprisingly out of help's range just a few feet, a few seconds back, and diving solo. Anyone who doesn't dive with a backup air system (the Spare Air is perfect security, especially above 100 feet) is adding needless risk to the dive.

    ReplyDelete
  67. I have mixed feelings about diving solo. I've had some bad experiences with dive buddies and at times thought that I would have been better off alone. In some cases I ended up alone because they just took off and I got tired of trying to keep up with them. It ruined a very expensive dive for me the last time that it happened.
    As I said, I have mixed feelings about it. I really believe that checking out the dive buddies available and thoroughly asking questions of the other person is essential. A strick list of expectations is a plus and sometimes sets you up for a much more enjoyable experience. Maybe a better practice for many would be to search out a buddy among the divers on the boat before you are assigned someone that you are just stuck with.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Ron C.

    If You are one of us old timers that got hooked on diving watching Lloyd Bridges on `Sea Hunt,' then Your first exposure to diving was without any Buddy support. How many times do You recall Mike Nelson having a buddy.

    Living in So. Calif. in my early years, I'd get Mom to drive me to Dana Point {there wasn't anything there then] and she bought about 300ft. of ski rope and tethered my to that while she set on the shore reading. If I held my breath to long she tugged on the rope.

    By the time I got my certification in the mid-60's I had learned about the value of having a buddy, but there are still times I have wanted my freedom of choice to just enjoy the solitude afforded only to a solo diver.

    Having been a Life Guard, and Water Safety Instructor I appreciate the value of having someone available in case of a problem, `BUT' as an adult You have the right to choose for Yourself. Do so based on Your experience, conditions of the dive, and good common sense, but it is Your right to choose to go solo.

    That said, I still enjoy the company of a good dive companion.

    Ron

    ReplyDelete
  69. I enjoyed the article on solo diving . I have been solo diving for a number of years and recently got solo certified . On a recent night dive in Guam I had to buddy up with soemone who had no computer or dive watch,no flashlight nor a tank light. How was I safer than being alone with my lights, back ups and pony?
    Please include more articles on solo diving in your mag. I would like to see more information on necessary skills ,equipment, charters and resort who accept solo certs.etc.

    ReplyDelete
  70. It is what ever turns your crank. It is your right to meet your maker on your own. Why take someone else with you. First off the captain is the one who gives direction on his boat. If you want to dive solo, get your own boat. Just remember your actions of what you do is also noted by other divers. Did you ever think maybe they don't want to dive with a cowboy diver. This sport is mostly a team effort, and I don't mind being part of the team. Safety is the number one thing. After all it is the foundation of being a excellent diver. Diving safe since 1985.

    ReplyDelete
  71. I've been diving 30 years, and most of the last few (10) have been solo. I get to do the dive I want, when I want. Had I only dived when a buddy was available, I'm sure I would have missed out on hundreds of dives (and experience). The concept of buddy diving started with the "never swim alone" rule. Well, we've come a long way since then with updated training and equipment, and there's no reason why we can't change the standards. Ask yourself, when you team up with a buddy, would you rather him/her be a competent, self-sufficient solo diver, or someone who's never been alone on a dive before? Think about it.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Wow, I meant to do this months ago. I dive alot solo because I do not need to worry about anyone elses schedule and I do not like having to "find" or "stay close" to a buddy. I like to do what I want and I am confident that I will be safe as long as I do not panic. I live in Port Townsend, WA and always dive at a place where I will not get lost and usually only go to 50-60ft for a few minutes. If I were to find somenone that had a boat so I could visit other places...then buddy diving would be cool.....Thanks!!

    ReplyDelete

You can comment using just your name in 'Select Profile' below.